Files
lean-bench/experiments/P0-pilot/labels/labels.json
T
codex-bot 6875c79c40
ci / python (pull_request) Successful in 22s
ci / lean (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
ci / image (pull_request) Has been skipped
fix(pilot): freeze AI labels and enforce auditable execution
2026-10-28 18:46:24 +08:00

428 lines
14 KiB
JSON

{
"labeler": "Codex AI assistant (this chat; exact deployed model identifier unavailable)",
"labeler_type": "AI; not human gold",
"frozen_at": "2026-10-28T10:42:10.032234+00:00",
"items_sha256": "487ecd22919a5e3b0174a2846ab8fe7c0daf4d3feccccf8ea6571aec04c41bed",
"key_sha256": "f827cac92ee4e907554fadcc7c0e006ef2b829350f74e7f8b54ca11945e62836",
"method": "Single-pass semantic annotation in shuffled blind-ID order; per-item compiler outcomes and detector outputs hidden. Pure syntax/proof defects are ignored when meaning is recoverable. No compiler/API-name audit. Full extracted-span coverage is assessed; unspecified design tasks or unresolved contextual references are not formalizable.",
"limitations": [
"Single AI annotator; no human adjudication or inter-annotator agreement.",
"The annotator reviewed detector implementation and aggregate compilation counts before labeling; only per-item outputs were hidden.",
"AI labels replace the originally planned human/Kimi labels by explicit owner instruction in this chat; the original human-ground-truth protocol is therefore not fully satisfied."
],
"labels": {
"P01": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The field axioms and nontriviality match the stated definition."
},
"P02": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The whole carrier and identity singleton are the two specified subgroups; API spelling is not assessed."
},
"P03": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Every integer unit is constrained to the two specified values."
},
"P04": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Generated subgroup is equated with all integer powers; escaped notation is treated as a syntax defect."
},
"P05": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Existence of a bijective multiplication-preserving map matches the definition."
},
"P06": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The theorem statement gives exactly the inverse-of-product identity; proof validity is not assessed."
},
"P07": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion",
"degenerate"
],
"notes": "Only already-assumed prime factors are asserted to exist; no recovery from the totient is specified."
},
"P08": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Both identity preservation and inverse preservation are stated under a multiplicative equivalence."
},
"P09": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "The multiplicative ring carrier does not encode the additive cyclic group, and the second extracted exercise is omitted."
},
"P10": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Both left and right equations have unique solutions."
},
"P11": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The group cardinality is the exponent, with the correct identity and quantification."
},
"P12": {
"verdict": "not_formalizable",
"errors": [
"other"
],
"notes": "The extracted design question provides no formal security or authentication specification for a fidelity comparison."
},
"P13": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "The intended modular identity is retained, but the integer variable is supplied to a natural-number coprimality predicate."
},
"P14": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "Only existence of a ring structure is stated; the identity and unit characterization are omitted."
},
"P15": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Unique solvability in both factors expresses the row and column permutation property."
},
"P16": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Passing to the product representation preserves the order-divisibility claim; capitalization and namespace errors are not semantic changes."
},
"P17": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "An independent non-field example in the extracted passage is omitted."
},
"P18": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The norm-one complex carrier and multiplication describe the specified subgroup; bundling/API validity is not assessed."
},
"P19": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "The natural-valued order convention needs an infinite-order convention absent from the cardinality definition."
},
"P20": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "A single left-identity action on one group element forces equality to the identity."
},
"P21": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "The intended commutativity equivalence is visible, but the left operation lacks the carrier annotation needed to identify G."
},
"P22": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The two quantified unique-solvability claims express the specified table property."
},
"P23": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Prime factors, modulus, lcm exponent and coprimality reproduce the extracted claim; no unstated distinctness assumption is introduced."
},
"P24": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion",
"degenerate"
],
"notes": "An arbitrary group satisfying an order condition is not identified with the geometric symmetry group."
},
"P25": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The two declarations cover both cancellation directions."
},
"P26": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"extra_hypothesis",
"missing_hypothesis"
],
"notes": "The inserted divisibility assumption does not express the RSA relationship required by the argument."
},
"P27": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "The isomorphism is asserted for a quotient of the ambient group instead of the stabilizer subgroup."
},
"P28": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "Natural exponent division fails to express a square root, and the homomorphism target does not encode the specified automorphism."
},
"P29": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "A bijective homomorphism supplies the isomorphism assumption and both power assertions are retained."
},
"P30": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "An unordered finite product is used for an arbitrary semigroup, losing the ordered nonempty product required by the exercise."
},
"P31": {
"verdict": "not_formalizable",
"errors": [
"other"
],
"notes": "The isolated instruction refers to an earlier map whose definition is absent; the actual proposition cannot be recovered from this span."
},
"P32": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion",
"degenerate"
],
"notes": "The result merely supplies an unspecified ring homomorphism and does not constrain it to evaluation at the matrix parameter."
},
"P33": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The cardinality assumption and the nonidentity involution conclusion match; the missing instance binder is a compilation defect."
},
"P34": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The contrasting abelian properties encode the reason these specified groups are not isomorphic."
},
"P35": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"quantifier"
],
"notes": "One fixed-arity function is applied at incompatible arities instead of specifying a coherent family of products."
},
"P36": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "The ring carrier replaces the concrete root-of-unity group, and neither its order nor the specified generator is stated."
},
"P37": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"degenerate",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "The declaration has no defining expression for the requested subgroup."
},
"P38": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"missing_hypothesis"
],
"notes": "Nonemptiness is missing, so the empty subset satisfies both closure assumptions."
},
"P39": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "Laurent series replace finite Laurent polynomials, and the requested units are not characterized."
},
"P40": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The supplied structure body fixes the function to the canonical integer residue map."
},
"P41": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"extra_hypothesis"
],
"notes": "The cardinality assertion is restricted to the range where noncommutativity holds, dropping the smaller symmetric groups."
},
"P42": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"missing_hypothesis",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "A necessary closure condition is promoted to sufficiency without inverse closure."
},
"P43": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Any two groups of the specified size are related by a multiplicative equivalence."
},
"P44": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The defining field is exactly commutativity of the group operation."
},
"P45": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"quantifier",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "Literal uniqueness of a carrier/structure replaces uniqueness up to group isomorphism."
},
"P46": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "Univariate polynomials over a product ring replace three-variable real polynomials; the units question is omitted."
},
"P47": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "The integer-span equality captures the generated set, but the equality for opposite generators is not explicitly stated."
},
"P48": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The one-sided inverse hypothesis gives the specified inverse element."
},
"P49": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The theorem statement is exactly involutivity of group inversion."
},
"P50": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The custom structure supplies additive commutative group, associative multiplication and both distributive laws without imposing a unit."
},
"P51": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The carrier, multiplication and identity encode the specified finite group; existence of the chosen API is not audited."
},
"P52": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion",
"degenerate"
],
"notes": "Ring structure and unit-to-constant direction are present, but identity characterization is replaced by reflexivity."
},
"P53": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"extra_hypothesis"
],
"notes": "Cardinality is represented only for finite groups although the definition is not restricted to them."
},
"P54": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "Multiplicative subgroup closure of a residue is used in place of the additive cyclic subgroup generated by it."
},
"P55": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The abelian-property equivalence is stated under an isomorphism."
},
"P56": {
"verdict": "not_formalizable",
"errors": [
"other"
],
"notes": "The design question does not specify an authenticity predicate or formal adversarial model."
},
"P57": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion"
],
"notes": "The homomorphism criterion is retained but the separate isomorphism definition is absent."
},
"P58": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "A multiplicative equivalence on the full residue ring does not represent the additive cyclic group in the comparison."
},
"P59": {
"verdict": "minor_drift",
"errors": [
"wrong_type"
],
"notes": "The inherited-group criterion is recognizable, but operations on the subset are not specified as restricted operations."
},
"P60": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_type",
"missing_hypothesis"
],
"notes": "Global bijections with local differentiability conditions do not specify self-diffeomorphisms of the open subset."
},
"P61": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "The homeomorphism type supplies the intended carrier and group structure under composition; notation validity is not assessed."
},
"P62": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Both least-positive exponent and the bounded-power description are retained, ignoring set-minimum API syntax."
},
"P63": {
"verdict": "faithful",
"errors": [],
"notes": "Both two-sided identity hypotheses and their equality are stated."
},
"P64": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"missing_hypothesis",
"extra_hypothesis"
],
"notes": "The exponent relation uses the ciphertext modulus where the RSA exponent modulus is required."
},
"P65": {
"verdict": "wrong",
"errors": [
"wrong_conclusion",
"degenerate"
],
"notes": "The arbitrary finite group is unrelated to the requested geometric symmetries, with the classification left in a comment."
}
}
}