Review 20 industry tag candidates and Litmus historical ARR
This commit is contained in:
@@ -184,8 +184,8 @@ async function main() {
|
||||
const research = await researchResponse.json();
|
||||
assert.equal(research.companies.length, 1051);
|
||||
assert.equal(research.categories.length, 11);
|
||||
assert.equal(research.evidence.length, 2160);
|
||||
assert.equal(research.observations.length, 299);
|
||||
assert.equal(research.evidence.length, 2191);
|
||||
assert.equal(research.observations.length, 304);
|
||||
assert.equal((await request("/api/research/ai-companies", { method: "POST", headers })).status, 405);
|
||||
const researchPage = await request("/docs/other-research/ai-company-research/overview", { headers });
|
||||
assert.equal(researchPage.status, 200);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ test("research revisions share the authentication database and preserve replay l
|
||||
assert.equal(consumeCode(config, "invalid"), "limited");
|
||||
const initial = readResearchSnapshot();
|
||||
assert.equal(initial.companies.length, 1051);
|
||||
assert.equal(initial.evidence.length, 2160);
|
||||
assert.equal(initial.observations.length, 299);
|
||||
assert.equal(initial.evidence.length, 2191);
|
||||
assert.equal(initial.observations.length, 304);
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(initial.candidateBatches, seed.candidateBatches, "candidate gaps persist in the same database metadata");
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(initial.directoryRechecks, seed.directoryRechecks, "follow-up classifications persist without rewriting the discovery audit");
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(readResearchSnapshot(), initial, "reopening does not duplicate records");
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ test("research validation rejects broken evidence and unsafe source links", () =
|
||||
|
||||
test("reviews link explicit companies without turning global or excluded cases into companies", () => {
|
||||
const snapshot = structuredClone(seed) as ResearchSnapshot;
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.reviews.filter((r) => r.scope === "companies").length, 136);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.reviews.filter((r) => r.scope === "companies").length, 138);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.reviews.filter((r) => r.scope === "dataset").length, 12);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.reviews.filter((r) => r.scope === "excluded-candidate").length, 44);
|
||||
const review = snapshot.reviews.find((r) => r.id === "R4")!;
|
||||
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ test("disclosure counts exclude client income, biographies, targets and duplicat
|
||||
const snapshot = seed as ResearchSnapshot;
|
||||
const summary = categorySummary(snapshot);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.count, 0), 1051);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.self, 0), 47);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.self, 0), 48);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.estimate, 0), 2);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.platform, 0), 19);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.unknown, 0), 983);
|
||||
assert.equal(summary.reduce((n, c) => n + c.unknown, 0), 982);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.find((c) => c.name === "Rork")?.revenueStatus, "unknown");
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.find((c) => c.name === "Result")?.revenueStatus, "unknown");
|
||||
assert.ok(snapshot.observations.filter((o) => o.selection === "signal").every((o) => o.scope === "公司整体"));
|
||||
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ test("disclosure counts exclude client income, biographies, targets and duplicat
|
||||
|
||||
test("technical reviews keep accessible materials separate from tested capabilities", () => {
|
||||
const snapshot = structuredClone(seed) as ResearchSnapshot;
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.filter((c) => c.technicalReview).length, 63);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.filter((c) => c.technicalReview).length, 64);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.filter((c) => c.technicalReview?.level === "public-artifact").length, 9);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.filter((c) => c.technicalReview?.level === "independent-test").length, 1);
|
||||
assert.equal(snapshot.companies.find((c) => c.id === "AI051")?.revenueStatus, "unknown");
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "2026-10-31-industry-9",
|
||||
"version": "2026-10-31-industry-10",
|
||||
"scopeConfirmedAt": "2026-10-30",
|
||||
"acceptance": "以确认的公开来源清单为边界,逐条核对并标明缺项。",
|
||||
"provenance": "S01—S12恢复自已提交用户的《AI公司研究_来源与分类模板》来源清单;S13—S16单列后续已使用的补充证据渠道,不将使用次数当作全量覆盖。",
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
|
||||
],
|
||||
"initialAccess": "官网目录可访问",
|
||||
"boundary": "已读取八个2025—2026批次镜像候选池1428条,再核YC官方页面;不声称覆盖全部YC历年或未公开公司。",
|
||||
"nextCheck": "原新增目录35条深化并保留发现来源;本快照基础项593条主营人工复核。原C07主营规则池184项已读:135保留、49迁移;另原C07目录标签池68项中的20项已读:15保留、5迁移,标签池余48项。F4核心分析明确非AI,保留目录对照且AI作用未确认;Opennote官网称收购后下线,Nexa仅目录Acquired。Channel3按开发者商务数据工具交付,sieve专家验证与Frekil现RWE/旧标注分开。客户AUM、漏收、节省和演示财务排除营收。C05原主营规则89项成果仍待另分支整合;其他基础资料及全部公开来源覆盖、财务/技术缺项继续保留。",
|
||||
"nextCheck": "原新增目录36条深化并保留发现来源;本快照基础项612条主营人工复核。原C07主营规则池184项已读:135保留、49迁移;原C07标签池68项中的40项已读:24保留、16迁移,余28项。Litmus历史6万ARR留缺不入同期比较;LogosGuard个人/企业数据流和Control Seat现硬件维护/旧集成分开。Inth产品代码审核及收费、Axial现内核/旧制造、FinalDoseAI实际作用与临床证据均按范围记录。客户节省、专利支出、前机构资产及旧收入排除。C05原主营规则89项成果待另一分支整合;其他基础资料、全部公开来源及财务/技术缺项继续保留。",
|
||||
"limitation": "批次不等于成立年;不代表全部公司"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"sourceVersion": "2026-10-31-industry-9",
|
||||
"sourceVersion": "2026-10-31-industry-10",
|
||||
"asOf": "2026-10-31",
|
||||
"metric": "platform-mrr-usd",
|
||||
"sampleUnit": "product-or-business",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user